Debunking the Myths about the Minimum Wage
The votes in the General Assembly were largely along party lines, with the vast majority of Democrats voting for the increase, and the vast majority of Republicans voting against it. However, in some other states the minimum wage is not a partisan issue. Most notably, in the November 2004 election, voters in both Florida and Nevada overwhelmingly voted to raise the minimum wage in their states by more than 2-1 margins. These states also voted to re-elect President Bush.
There are a lot of myths about the minimum wage. Opponents argue that increasing the minimum wage will cause job loss, hurt the people it is supposed to help, pad the wallets of rich suburban teens, drive away business, and cause balding and tooth decay (okay, maybe not those last two). We’ll dispel some of those myths here.
1. Raising the minimum wage will hurt the very people it is intended to help by forcing layoffs and causing low-wage job losses.
We’ll get to the research, but first let me offer this observation: In years (almost two decades now) of doing poverty research or analyzing issues affecting lower-income people, I have never come across a low wage worker advocating against a minimum wage increase. It was interesting to hear the corporate executives articulate their opposition to the minimum wage increase out of their concern for how it would affect low wage workers, only to have their testimony followed by low-wage workers themselves making compelling cases for an increase in the minimum wage. Who is better suited to articulate the interests of low-wage workers than low-wage workers themselves?
On to the research.
There is a consensus among contemporary economists that moderate increases in the minimum wage do not lead to job loss.
- Four Nobel prize-winning economists were joined by 558 other economists in signing a letter supporting an increase in the federal minimum wage to $7.00 per hour in 2004. Their letter states, "We believe that a modest increase in the minimum wage would improve the well-being of low-wage workers and would not have the adverse effects that critics have claimed."
- The Council of Economic Advisers stated in the 1999 Economic Report of the President that "the weight of the evidence suggests that modest increases in the minimum wage have had very little or no effect on employment."
- Following the most recent federal minimum wage increase in 1996 the low-wage labor market performed better than it had in decades. Noted labor economist Jared Bernstein argued before Congress that "the fact that employment and earnings opportunities of low-wage workers grew so quickly following that increase continues to pose a daunting challenge to those who still maintain that minimum wage increases hurt their intended beneficiaries.
2. Increasing the minimum wage will just put more money into the pockets of rich suburban teens.
We also heard this argument in Annapolis. We were ready to respond with some of the geeky facts below, but ultimately took a pass after one of the more senior Delegates made this point (we paraphrase): "I eat out a lot, usually stopping at a fast food drive-thru on my way home. I can’t remember the last time that the person who waited on me was younger than I am. These are seniors with small social security benefits who are working in these low-wage jobs to get by."
Alas, the rich suburban teen argument did not pass the sight test.
Undoubtedly, some minimum wage workers are teens from higher income families. However, increasing the minimum wage would target most of the wage gains to the primary wage-earners in lower income families:
- The earnings of low-wage workers contributed more than two-thirds of their total family income in 2002.
- Half of low-income, low-wage workers were married or had children.
Eighty seven percent were 20 years of age or older. - More than half (53 percent) of the wage gains from increasing the minimum wage by $1.00 per hour would go to families that currently receive 14 percent of total income.
Not all of the wage gains would go to poor or near-poor families. Nonetheless, increasing the minimum wage is a well-targeted way to boost the incomes of our poorest working families.
3. Raising the minimum wage will hurt small business
There is ample contemporary research that casts a long shadow of doubt over the contention that raising minimum wage will hurt small business. Jerold Waltman examined the relationship between business failures and minimum wage increases. He found that "there seems to be no discernible correlation between minimum wage increases and a rise in business failures, either in the year the increase occurred or in the following year. If anything, the evidence leans the other way." (page 221, Politics of the Minimum Wage, University of Illinois Press).
A 2004 study by the Fiscal Policy Institute examined the impact of minimum wage increases on small businesses. Their analysis focused on various outcomes for businesses with less than 50 employees, comparing outcomes in states with minimum wages higher than federal level to those with minimums at the federal level. They found that:
- Between 1998 and 2001, the number of small business establishments grew twice as quickly in states with higher minimum wages;
- Retail employment grew 1.5 times more quickly in high minimum wage states; and,
- Annual and average payroll growth was faster in higher minimum wage states.
Their analysis, like others, does not conclude that increasing the minimum wage will boost employment growth over what it otherwise would have been. Nonetheless, the report points out that "What does seem to be clear…is that it is hard to sustain the argument made by some observers that an increase in the minimum wage will result in adverse aggregate employment outcomes."
Certainly, there are some individual businesses that could be disadvantaged by increasing the minimum wage. But, in general, any negative impacts are likely to be so small that they would be undetectable at a macro level.
4. Establishing a minimum wage is a federal issue, and not a state issue.
Increasingly states are establishing minimum wages above the federal floor out of concern that the federal floor is too low.
As a nation, we are on track to tie the longest period over which the Congress has failed to increase the minimum wage. The most recent minimum wage increase occurred in 1997, almost eight years ago. In contrast, the minimum wage was increased six times during a seven year period in the 1970s.
If the minimum wage had kept pace with inflation since 1968, the current minimum wage would be over $9.00 per hour. More recently, the entire value of the 1996 and 1997 increases has been eroded by inflation.
In response, several states have established minimum wages above the federal floor. Nearly 40 percent of people live in states that have minimum wages that are higher than the federal minimum.
The Real Deal Over the Minimum Wage
Proponents and opponents for increasing the minimum wage will argue about the impacts and present data to support or refute arguments (just like we've done here). The data are important, but are not the primary drivers of this issue.
None of the research makes as compelling a case as one of the workers who testified before the Maryland Senate. This individual explained how he worked 130 to 140 hours a week at low-wage jobs to make ends meet. He explained to Senators how some days he would work around the clock: 8 a.m. to 4 p.m as a teacher’s assistant, 4 p.m. to midnight as a residential counselor at a group home, and midnight to 8 a.m. cleaning. "The cost of everything is going up," he said.
I often wonder just where it is that the parking attendant, the clerk at CVS, the counter person at the local deli live, and how they make rent on such a low wage. How do they afford a car or car insurance?
Median household income in Maryland is more than $55,0000 a year, tied for the highest in the U.S. Maryland is tied for first among states in the percentage of adults who have a bachelor’s degree. Maryland ranks second among states in the percentage of adults who have a graduate or professional degree and we have the second highest concentration of doctoral scientists and engineers. Maryland’s high-skilled workforce is closely connected to the development of the high-tech and bio-tech sectors in our state.
Collectively, we are rich. But not everyone is sharing in the prosperity. Raising the minimum wage is one way to provide a modest boost to working people who will continue to struggle to make ends meet. MBTPI
To get more information on the minimum wage, we recommend the web site of the Economic Policy Institute. Click on the subject heading "minimum wage" Also, see our testimony on the Senate minimum wage bill.

9 Comments:
WOW! Good luck coming up with an encore to this debut post! Honestly the most succinct, persuasive piece on the subject I've seen.
By
LittleDuker, at 5:52 PM
There exists a perhaps unforumalted social contract between "the public" and business. Becuase the free market and the entrapanuers who work in it can provide both needed and simply desired goods, it is a wise idea for the public to see to it that the free market thrives by investing in it -- things like court systems, roads, police, sewer, water, school, agenctices like DBED etc. are examples of such investments. Ideally the public invests in making the market happen, talented folks succeed in, are able to in effect repay their debt (with goods, wages, and taxes) to those who made their enterprise possible, and then, because of their hard work and talent, become justly and personally rich. Nothing wrong with the true American Dream which is not only to get rich, but be justly rich.
However, human nature being what it is, there is always a tendantcy for business people to want to profit beyond what they justly contribute to the greater good -- being a trully sucessfull business owner is a hard road to hoe, as hard as being a working artist and not just a dabbler. Thereby many fail to make good on the public investment made in the infrastructure that is a necessary, but not sufficient, condition for business to thrive. Yet they want the profit, and more importantly admiration (think fancy cars and pinky rings) anyway. Thus we get those who, as John Edwards aptly puts it, "value wealth over work."
There is somewhere a natural and fair give and take here, a mean not defined ahead of time that consititutes distributive justice. Glad to know that the research shows that asking business to pay a higher minimun wage is not an unreasonable public request. To my thinking, such a bill not only keeps the terms of the contract in ballance, but as importantly improves the virtue and character of the some of the most talented people amoung us -- bussiness people.
By
Jensen, at 7:26 PM
Really nicely done. Thank you so much for doing this. I had hoped that this was the kind of conversation that could go on at the Maryland Democratic Party blog, but you took the bull by the horns here, and I hope they link you.
By
Stephanie Dray, at 2:46 PM
# The earnings of low-wage workers contributed more than two-thirds of their total family income in 2002.
# Half of low-income, low-wage workers were married or had children.
Eighty seven percent were 20 years of age or older.
Will you define "low-wage" as used in these points?
By
NPS, at 12:44 PM
NPS: Thanks for your question.
The data used are from our colleagues Jared Bernstein and Jeff Chapman at the Economic Policy Institute. You will find plenty of information there on the minimum wage.
"Low-wage" workers are those earning between $5.15 and $7.99 per hour.
"Low-income" families are those with incomes below 200 percent of the federal poverty level. That is less than $29,000 per year for a family of three in 2002.
Steve Hill
shill@mdnonprofit.org
FYI for NPS and other commenters: Please include a name and email address. Thanks.
By
MarylandPolicyBlog, at 5:13 PM
That was a nice blog you posted.. I make $6.25 an hour at a small buisness in Harford County. I am 18 years old and have been working there a year. A 16 year old, newly hired, makes the same as me. Being under age for driving, she doesn't have to pay for gas, insurance, or any thing else that comes with a car. I head off to college in a few months, and must pay for books (which don't come cheap these days!). The people that comment that the wages are A-okay in Maryland, must 1) be out of college (not having to pay what your parent won't), and 2) not be making minimum wage.
Holly
hollyday1007@hotmail.com
By
Holly, at 11:46 PM
This post has been removed by a blog administrator.
By
Holly, at 11:46 PM
To Holly,
regarding the 16 year old who does not have to spend money on automobile expenses: Neither do you. You can live without a car.
By
quadratic, at 10:35 AM
Thank you for the opportunity to leave a comment. I am impressed with the treatment of the topic. However, everything from the top to the comments (i.e. the main text) is invisible as it is white text on white background. I have to `select' the text to highlight it and make it visible.
By
googsum, at 5:42 PM
Post a Comment
<< Home