About the "Wal Mart" Tax...
...or, Maryland, We Have a Problem
Health insurance is expensive. It is expensive when government provides it. It is expensive when individuals pay for it on their own. It is expensive when businesses offer it to their employees.
Cost is a big reason why 45 million people in the U.S. go the entire year without health insurance, and millions more go without for shorter periods of time.
The number of people without health insurance has been growing dramatically in recent years–up 5.2 million in just three years. The increase in the number of people without health insurance is almost equal to the number of people who live in Maryland.
At the same time, governments have been paying for health coverage for more and more people. In the same three year period that 5.2 million more people went without health insurance, the state and federal government provided health insurance coverage to 7.9 million more people.
So how is it that Medicaid rolls are up by 6.1 million people, Medicare rolls are up 1.7 million, but more than 5 million more people don’t have health insurance?
Part of the answer has to do with population growth. There are more of us, so there would be some natural growth in the number who don’t have health insurance. But the biggest reason is the decline in work-based health insurance. Most people get their health insurance through work, but those numbers have been going down in recent years. How much?
If the share of U.S. residents who had work-based health insurance remained steady at the 2000 level, then in 2003 there would have been 9.4 million more people with work-based health insurance. (See the attached chart for an explanation).
Before we start bashing employers here, remember, health insurance is expensive. I asked my favorite insurance agent to give me some quotes for small group coverage. Assuming an average age of 45 and a pretty good health plan, the annual cost for individual coverage was $6,200; add a family and the annual cost exceeds $17,000.
Make it an HMO and increase copays and one can reduce the cost. On the other hand, add dental, vision or a myriad of other options and the costs can go way up. No matter what you do, it’s still darn expensive.
Some companies, like Giant Food (and Maryland Nonprofits), have made a commitment to providing affordable health insurance for their employees. Giant claimed that their health insurance costs were equal to about 22 percent of their payroll. Apparently, they were finding it increasingly difficult to compete in a marketplace with Wal Mart, which apparently does not have the same commitment to affordable health insurance for their employees.
And, the marketplace aside, we all pay when companies don’t offer health insurance. We pay when people end up in a government plan like Medicaid, and we pay when people end up getting care that they can’t pay for in the emergency room.
What we really need is a conversation about how we provide health care in Maryland and throughout the country. The first step is acknowledging that we have a problem.
Government doesn’t want to pay more and has been working to reduce their health costs. Companies are in business to make a profit, and health insurance costs are becoming a growing part of their costs. Caught in the crossfire are the 45 million people here who don’t have health coverage.
Maryland’s new threshold would be a baby step toward a solution, and a starting point for a larger conversation about how we all get access to health care (and how we pay for it). MBTPI
Addendum, May 20, 2005: A lot of people are coming to this blog entry from search engines. A brief, thorough, and unbiased description of Maryland's Fair Share Health Care Act is available from the Maryland Department of Legislative Services. An even shorter description is provided in the comments section of this blog from Glenn Schneider of the Maryland Citizens Health Initiative.
This bill was vetoed by Maryland Governor Robert L. Ehrlich Jr. on May 19, 2005. Any consideration of overriding the veto would not occur until the legislature reconvenes in January 2006.
Health insurance is expensive. It is expensive when government provides it. It is expensive when individuals pay for it on their own. It is expensive when businesses offer it to their employees.
Cost is a big reason why 45 million people in the U.S. go the entire year without health insurance, and millions more go without for shorter periods of time.
The number of people without health insurance has been growing dramatically in recent years–up 5.2 million in just three years. The increase in the number of people without health insurance is almost equal to the number of people who live in Maryland.
At the same time, governments have been paying for health coverage for more and more people. In the same three year period that 5.2 million more people went without health insurance, the state and federal government provided health insurance coverage to 7.9 million more people.
So how is it that Medicaid rolls are up by 6.1 million people, Medicare rolls are up 1.7 million, but more than 5 million more people don’t have health insurance?
Part of the answer has to do with population growth. There are more of us, so there would be some natural growth in the number who don’t have health insurance. But the biggest reason is the decline in work-based health insurance. Most people get their health insurance through work, but those numbers have been going down in recent years. How much?
If the share of U.S. residents who had work-based health insurance remained steady at the 2000 level, then in 2003 there would have been 9.4 million more people with work-based health insurance. (See the attached chart for an explanation).
Before we start bashing employers here, remember, health insurance is expensive. I asked my favorite insurance agent to give me some quotes for small group coverage. Assuming an average age of 45 and a pretty good health plan, the annual cost for individual coverage was $6,200; add a family and the annual cost exceeds $17,000.
Make it an HMO and increase copays and one can reduce the cost. On the other hand, add dental, vision or a myriad of other options and the costs can go way up. No matter what you do, it’s still darn expensive.
Some companies, like Giant Food (and Maryland Nonprofits), have made a commitment to providing affordable health insurance for their employees. Giant claimed that their health insurance costs were equal to about 22 percent of their payroll. Apparently, they were finding it increasingly difficult to compete in a marketplace with Wal Mart, which apparently does not have the same commitment to affordable health insurance for their employees.
And, the marketplace aside, we all pay when companies don’t offer health insurance. We pay when people end up in a government plan like Medicaid, and we pay when people end up getting care that they can’t pay for in the emergency room.
What we really need is a conversation about how we provide health care in Maryland and throughout the country. The first step is acknowledging that we have a problem.
Government doesn’t want to pay more and has been working to reduce their health costs. Companies are in business to make a profit, and health insurance costs are becoming a growing part of their costs. Caught in the crossfire are the 45 million people here who don’t have health coverage.
Maryland’s new threshold would be a baby step toward a solution, and a starting point for a larger conversation about how we all get access to health care (and how we pay for it). MBTPI
Addendum, May 20, 2005: A lot of people are coming to this blog entry from search engines. A brief, thorough, and unbiased description of Maryland's Fair Share Health Care Act is available from the Maryland Department of Legislative Services. An even shorter description is provided in the comments section of this blog from Glenn Schneider of the Maryland Citizens Health Initiative.
This bill was vetoed by Maryland Governor Robert L. Ehrlich Jr. on May 19, 2005. Any consideration of overriding the veto would not occur until the legislature reconvenes in January 2006.

8 Comments:
Even though health insurance costs are astronomically high, this bill only affects WalMart; a corporation that engages in notoriously nefarious business practices. Lawsuits against WalMart abound, including charges of hiring illegal aliens, discrimination against women and minorities, and refusal to comply with labor laws regarding overtime pay. WalMart's lack of concern for its employees and labor laws, coupled with the fact that Walton family members represent 5 of the top 8 richest people in America (Forbes magazine), makes it hard to accept unaffordability (for such a basic human benefit) as an acceptable excuse.
By UnionMan, at 1:52 PM
US health care is a mess because we tie it to employment and we let profit making health insurance companies take a big chunk of money and create a big, unecessary bureaucracy -- 25% of health care cost is duplicative overhead -- patients, doctors, hospitals, insurance companies all get stuck with this nonsense.
The issue is not Wal-Mart -- they are easy to beat up and deserve a lot criticism. The issue is the unwillingness of elected officials from the two major parties to face up to the health insurance industry -- get them out of health care and things will be much more affordable. With a single payer system we will reduce overhead costs immediately and be able to control costs better.
Kevin
By Kevin Zeese, at 4:36 PM
I am curious. I supported the Fair Share bill and genuinely despise Walmart for the way they are undermining local economies and the wage structure of communities across the nation. IF they are the wave of the future, as they claim, we are all in big trouble.
My question is whether anyone has done a legal analysis of the legislation. This was prompted by a question from one of our local judges.
By Del. Doyle Niemann, at 10:31 AM
To Delegate Niemann and all the Fair Share supporters, we thank you for supporting this important piece of legislation. If you haven't written the Governor yet in support of this bill, please do so ASAP.
As Executive Director of Maryland Health Care for All! (one of the key partners behind the Fair Share Bill), I assure you that we had many legal minds (including some ERISA experts) take a look at this legislation to make sure it would withstand ERISA challenges.
Let's also be clear...
1. The bill does not single out WalMart. All companies of 10,000 or more employees are required to chip in and help their employees afford health care up to the 8% payroll threshold. Right now, there are 4 large companies that are effected by this bill -- WalMart, Giant Food, Northrup Grumman, and Johns Hopkins. The number of large companies will likely grow in the future as companies expand.
2. The bill sets a minimum standard for health care spending by large "in-state" companies now and into the future. That's what I find most important about this bill. If WalMart is not currently meeting that standard, they will have to chip in more or pay the difference to the state. Same thing goes for all other large companies.
3. Companies not currently doing their fair share on health care have a choice. If they are not currently spending 8% payroll on health care, they can either pay the state the difference OR expand health care benefits for their employees. We hope the companies invest in their employees rather than pay the state.
4. This is not an "anti-WalMart" bill. Taxpayers should not have to bear the health care costs of our state's largest and most profitable companies. Every time uninsured WalMart workers, for example, go to the ER and cannot pay for their treatment, taxpayers bear the cost. Big companies (including WalMart) need to do their fair share so that taxpayers do not have to bear their costs.
If anyone has any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us or visit our website at http://www.healthcareforall.com
By Glenn Schneider, at 10:36 PM
It's a shame that we even have to draft this legislation. However, even though this isn't a WalMart bill, it's shameful that 5 of our richest citizens can't seem to provide adequate insurance for their workforce. In some states, WalMart povides counciling services to their employees on how to use state run health care for low income workers. Basicly they help their employees become burdens to taxpayers while the company continues to enrich the owners.
By Chip Cook, at 9:24 PM
Seems to me we are often looking at the wrong problem. People too often complain about companies not covering enough health insurance.
But the issue no one seems to talk about is how the insurance companies are able to keep charging higher and higher rates! Lip service is given to frivolous or malpractice lawsuits driving up insurance costs, but that in no way explains the record profits for virtually every company, with no apparently consequence!
The insurance industry wields too much power in this country. Way too much power.
By haydesigner in SD, at 4:21 AM
home equity loans mortgage rates home loans home equity line of credit car insurance cash advance credit cards debt consolidation dental plans health insurance home equity line of credit home equity loan home equity loans debt consolidation home finance home loan life insurance mortgage mortgage mortgage brokers mortgage companies mortgage lenders mortgage loans mortgage loan mortgage refinance mortgage refinance mortgage refinancing mortgages mortgage cash advance payday loans realtors refinance web hosting Alabama mortgage Alaska mortgage Arizona mortgage California mortgage Colorado mortgage Connecticut mortgage Mortgage Delaware mortgage Florida mortgage Georgia mortgagerefinance refinance Hawaii mortgage Idaho mortgage Illinois mortgage Indiana mortgage Iowa mortgage Kansas mortgage Kentucky mortgage Louisiana mortgage Maine mortgage Maryland mortgage Massachusetts mortgage Michigan mortgage Minnesota mortgage Mississippi mortgage Missouri mortgage Montana mortgage Nebraska mortgage Nevada mortgage New Hampshire mortgage New Jersey mortgage New Mexico mortgage New York mortgage North Carolina mortgage North Dakota mortgage Ohio mortgage Oklahoma mortgagemortgage rates Oregon mortgage Pennsylvania mortgage Rhode Island mortgage South Carolina mortgage South Dakota mortgage Tennessee mortgage Texas mortgage Utah mortgage Vermont mortgage Virginia mortgage Washington mortgage West Virginia mortgage Wisconsin mortgage Wyoming mortgage online casinos online poker cheap domain names domain names
By mortgage, at 11:22 PM
nice blog. check out my site. Mortgage Best Mortgage Rates Mortgage Online
By Mortgage-Cashback.com, at 12:27 PM
Post a Comment
<< Home